@washingtonpost/front-end-utils
> TODO: description
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Manual publish by known maintainer, provenance direction unchanged. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Corporate org rotating employee npm accounts; stable pattern for this WaPo package. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): Same rotation; no takeover behavior observed. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Sparse README is a long-standing internal-utils package trait, not spam. | ai |
Versions (showing 6 of 6)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3.1 | 0 / 3 | |
| 1.3.0 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.2.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.2.1 | 0 / 2 | |
| 1.2.0 | 0 / 3 | |
| 1.1.1 | 0 / 3 |
v1.3.0
3 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: tam.steph.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (tam.steph) than the most recent previously approved version (artmsilva) on 2025-04-24, but tam.steph is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.2.2
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: artmsilva.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.