@web3-onboard/injected-wallets
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established Blocknative monorepo package; lack of provenance is consistent across all versions and not a risk indicator here. | ai |
Versions (showing 5 of 5)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11.3 | 3 / 6 | |
| 2.11.2 | 3 / 6 | |
| 2.11.1 | 3 / 6 | |
| 2.11.0 | 3 / 6 | |
| 2.10.17 | 3 / 6 |
v2.11.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.11.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.11.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.10.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.