@webitel/api-services
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:src/gen/agent-service/agent-service.msw.ts | AI (source-diff): Generated orval/msw mock file with long faker chains, not true obfuscation. | ai | |
| source-diff | large-new-source-files | AI (source-diff): Expected growth from orval-generated API client/mocks/schemas. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition from personal account to GitHub Actions CI with SLSA attestation is a legitimate and more secure publishing pattern. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@faker-js/faker | AI (phantom-deps): faker is a test data library; plausible for mock/test support in API services, no install scripts. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:msw | AI (phantom-deps): msw is a mock service worker library; plausible dev/test dep in an API services package, no install scripts. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all 143 versions of this package; low risk given publisher track record. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:qs-esm | AI (phantom-deps): qs-esm is a query-string utility; plausible runtime dep for API services, no install scripts. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:lodash-es | AI (phantom-deps): lodash-es is a standard utility library; plausible dep, no install scripts. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 63)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.54 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.53 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.52 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.51 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.50 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.49 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.48 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.47 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.46 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.45 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.44 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.43 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.42 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.41 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.40 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.39 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.38 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.37 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.36 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.35 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.32 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.28 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.24 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.22 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.21 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.20 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.19 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.18 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.15 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.14 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.12 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.11 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.10 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.9 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.8 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.7 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.1.3 | 3 / 17 | |
| 0.1.2 | 3 / 17 | |
| 0.0.112 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.0.111 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.0.110 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.0.109 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.0.108 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.0.107 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.0.106 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.0.105 | 4 / 17 | |
| 0.0.104 | 4 / 16 | |
| 0.0.103 | 4 / 16 | |
| 0.0.101 | 4 / 16 | |
| 0.0.100 | 4 / 16 | |
| 0.0.98 | 4 / 16 |
v0.1.54
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.1.53
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.1.52
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.1.51
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.1.50
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.1.49
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.1.48
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.1.47
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.1.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.8
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.112
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.111
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.110
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.109
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.108
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.107
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.106
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.105
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.104
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.103
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.101
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.100
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.98
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.