@wix/auto_sdk_events_rsvp
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Wix routinely migrates packages to wix-ci-publisher; this is a known org-wide CI transition pattern. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): Consistent with Wix centralizing publishing under wix-ci-publisher; not indicative of takeover. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Wix auto-generated SDK packages consistently lack descriptions/repo URLs; pattern is structural, not suspicious. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Wix SDK auto-generated packages intentionally omit descriptions; stable false positive for this publisher. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Wix CI pipeline does not attach Sigstore provenance; consistent across all approved Wix SDK packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 39 of 39)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.44 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.43 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.42 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.41 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.40 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.39 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.38 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.37 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.36 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.35 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.34 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.33 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.32 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.31 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.30 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.29 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.28 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.27 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.26 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.25 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.24 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.23 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.22 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.21 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.20 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.19 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.18 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.17 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.16 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.15 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.14 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.13 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.12 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.11 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.10 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.9 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.8 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.7 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.6 | 2 / 1 |
v1.0.44
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.43
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.42
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.41
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.40
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.39
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.38
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.37
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.36
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.35
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.34
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.33
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.32
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.31
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.30
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.29
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.8
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-05-08. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.