@wix/auto_sdk_get-paid_receipts
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Wix SDK packages are generated on-demand; dormancy followed by activity is expected, not indicative of takeover. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Wix auto-generated SDK package; templated name/no metadata is expected for this package family. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Wix auto-generated SDK packages consistently lack descriptions; stable false positive. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Wix CI publisher does not use Sigstore provenance; consistent across all versions. | ai |
Versions (showing 16 of 316)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.32 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.31 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.30 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.29 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.28 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.27 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.26 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.25 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.24 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.23 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.22 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.21 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.20 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.19 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.18 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.0.17 | 2 / 1 |
v1.0.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.