@wix/auto_sdk_seo_robots-txt
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Mass-produced Wix auto-SDK package; templated name/no metadata is expected for this publisher's pattern. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Auto-generated Wix SDK package; missing description is a known pattern for this publisher. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Wix CI publisher consistently publishes without provenance; low risk given track record. | ai |
Versions (showing 20 of 20)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.19 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.18 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.17 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.16 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.15 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.14 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.13 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.12 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.11 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.10 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.9 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.8 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.7 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.6 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.5 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.4 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.3 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.2 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.1 | 2 / 2 | |
| 1.0.0 | 2 / 2 |
v1.0.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.