@xtaskjs/common
Common decorators, validation, and utilities for xtaskjs.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Publish environment change (prepack removal) explains missing gitHead; no malicious indicators present. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:coverage/lcov-report/prettify.js | AI (source-diff): Standard Istanbul/nyc coverage report artifact (Google Code Prettify); not runtime code, not malicious. | ai | |
| source-diff | source-size-tripled | AI (source-diff): Size increase is entirely due to generated lcov HTML coverage report files, not injected payload. | ai |
Versions (showing 28 of 28)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.47 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.46 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.44 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.43 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.42 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.37 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.35 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.33 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.31 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.30 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.29 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.28 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.27 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.26 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.25 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.24 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.23 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.22 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.21 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.20 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.18 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.17 | 0 / 11 | |
| 1.0.16 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.14 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.13 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.11 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.4 | 0 / 9 | |
| 1.0.1 | 0 / 9 |
v1.0.47
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: xavi78.
v1.0.46
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: xavi78.
v1.0.44
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: xavi78.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.43
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: xavi78.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.42
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: xavi78.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.37
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.35
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.33
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.31
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.30
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.29
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.28
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.27
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.23
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.22
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.21
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.14
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.13
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.11
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.