@zappar/zappar
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): GitLab CI/CD publisher; provenance attestation not yet configured but package is long-established and low-risk. | ai |
Versions (showing 5 of 5)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3.0 | 2 / 2 | |
| 4.2.1 | 2 / 2 | |
| 4.2.0 | 2 / 2 | |
| 4.1.0 | 2 / 2 | |
| 4.0.0 | 2 / 2 |
v4.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.