@zxing/library
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:text-encoding | AI (phantom-deps): Optional polyfill dep used conditionally, not a top-level import pattern. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition to GitHub Actions CI publishing with SLSA attestation; legitimate automation change for this org. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Long-dormant OSS project resuming development; SLSA attestation confirms legitimate CI pipeline. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established package with a known GitHub repo; lack of Sigstore provenance is common and not a risk signal for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 34 of 34)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.23.0 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.22.0 | 1 / 20 | |
| 0.21.3 | 1 / 35 | |
| 0.21.2 | 1 / 35 | |
| 0.21.1 | 1 / 35 | |
| 0.21.0 | 2 / 35 | |
| 0.16.2 | 1 / 41 | |
| 0.16.1 | 2 / 41 | |
| 0.16.0 | 2 / 41 | |
| 0.15.2 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.13.0 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.12.3 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.12.2 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.12.1 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.12.0 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.11.0 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.10.0 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.9.4 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.9.3 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.9.2 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.9.1 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.9.0 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.8.5 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.8.4 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.8.3 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.8.2 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.8.1 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.8.0 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.7.0 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.6.0 | 2 / 39 | |
| 0.5.1 | 2 / 41 | |
| 0.5.0 | 2 / 41 | |
| 0.3.2 | 2 / 40 | |
| 0.3.1 | 2 / 40 |
v0.21.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.21.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.16.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.16.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.16.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.15.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.13.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: odahcam.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.10.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.