bpmnlint
Validate your BPMN diagrams based on configurable lint rules
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Org-internal maintainer transition on a long-standing legitimate package, no code changes. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Same transition; package content unchanged vs prior approved version. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Fires due to a prior maintainer being flagged; current publisher nikku is a trusted bpmn-io contributor. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Long-established package; absence of provenance is common and not a risk indicator here. | ai |
Versions (showing 22 of 22)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 11.12.1 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.12.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.11.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.10.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.9.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.8.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.7.3 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.7.2 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.7.1 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.7.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.6.1 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.6.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.5.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.4.4 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.4.3 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.4.2 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.4.1 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.4.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.3.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.2.0 | 10 / 12 | |
| 11.1.0 | 10 / 10 | |
| 11.0.0 | 10 / 10 |
v11.12.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.11.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (barmac) than the most recent previously approved version (jarekdanielak) on 2026-02-10, but barmac is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v11.9.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.8.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.7.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.4.3
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-04-25. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.4.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.4.1
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (barmac) than the most recent previously approved version (nikku) on 2025-02-28, but barmac is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v11.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v11.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v11.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.