← Home

disk

Pure-JS client and CLI for Archil disks

28
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Verified
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

SLSA provenance attestation npm registry signatures No source commit

Maintainers

jhleathsachinraja

Keywords

archildiskfilesystemcli

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): Side effect of transition to CI/CD-attested publishing, not a compromise indicator. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): Coincides with legitimate CI/CD provenance improvement, not account takeover. ai
dependencies unvetted-dep:@archildata/api-types AI (dependencies): First-party companion package matching Archil disk client scope. ai
publish-pattern new-deps-added AI (publish-pattern): zod and archildata types are legitimate additions for this client library. ai
dependencies unvetted-dep:openapi-fetch AI (dependencies): openapi-fetch is a well-known, widely-used OpenAPI client library; its unvetted status is a pipeline artifact, not a real risk for this package. ai

Versions (showing 28 of 28)

Version Deps Published
0.8.22 5 / 4
0.8.21 5 / 4
0.8.20 5 / 4
0.8.19 5 / 4
0.8.18 3 / 5
0.8.17 3 / 5
0.8.16 3 / 5
0.8.15 3 / 5
0.8.14 3 / 5
0.8.13 3 / 5
0.8.12 2 / 4
0.8.11 2 / 4
0.8.10 2 / 4
0.8.9 2 / 4
0.8.8 2 / 4
0.8.0 3 / 3
0.7.1 3 / 3
0.7.0 3 / 3
0.6.2 3 / 3
0.6.1 4 / 3
0.6.0 4 / 3
0.5.1 4 / 3
0.5.0 4 / 3
0.4.1 2 / 3
0.4.0 2 / 1
0.3.0 0 / 0
0.2.0 0 / 0
0.1.0 0 / 0

v0.8.22

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: GitHub Actions.

INFO Has SLSA provenance attestation provenance

Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.

INFO Publisher changed: jhleath → GitHub Actions (on unknown date, now via trusted publisher with provenance) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (GitHub Actions) than the most recent previously approved version (jhleath) on unknown date, but it carries Sigstore provenance attestation. This means the package moved to a trusted publisher (CI/CD with OIDC, e.g. GitHub Actions) — a supply-chain integrity improvement, not a compromise, since a stolen npm token cannot forge provenance bound to the source repository. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v0.8.21

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jhleath.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.8.20

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jhleath.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.8.19

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jhleath.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.8.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.7.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.7.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.6.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.6.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.6.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.5.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.5.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.4.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.4.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.3.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.2.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.1.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.