graphql-relational-schema-transformer
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): AWS Amplify monorepo package; provenance not published for this ecosystem consistently. | ai |
Versions (showing 8 of 8)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.21.40 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.21.39 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.21.38 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.21.37 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.21.36 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.21.35 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.21.34 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.21.33 | 5 / 2 |
v2.21.38
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.21.37
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.21.36
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.21.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.21.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.