← Home

phoenix

19
Versions
License
No
Install Scripts
Verified
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

SLSA provenance attestation npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Maintainers

chrismccordjosevalimsteffend

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
source-diff obfuscated-file-transition:priv/static/phoenix.js AI (source-diff): phoenix.js is webpack-minified dist bundle, not obfuscation; stable build artifact. ai
source-diff net-exec-file-transition:priv/static/phoenix.js AI (source-diff): Bundled client lib; net+eval patterns are webpack runtime, no hostile destination. ai
provenance regressed-provenance AI (provenance): Manual publish by known maintainer on official Phoenix package; benign, no malicious behavior in diff. ai
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): Moved to GitHub Actions CI/CD publishing with SLSA provenance; legitimate transition for this package. ai
publish-pattern rapid-publish AI (publish-pattern): CI/CD automated publishing commonly produces rapid successive publishes. ai

Versions (showing 19 of 19)

Version Deps Published
1.8.9 0 / 12
1.8.8 0 / 12
1.8.7 0 / 12
1.8.6 0 / 12
1.8.5 0 / 12
1.7.24 0 / 0
1.7.23 0 / 0
1.7.22 0 / 0
1.7.21 0 / 0
1.7.20 0 / 0
1.7.19 0 / 0
1.7.18 0 / 0
1.7.17 0 / 0
1.7.16 0 / 0
1.7.15 0 / 0
1.7.14 0 / 0
1.7.13 0 / 0
1.6.17 0 / 0
1.5.15 0 / 0

v1.8.9

1 finding
INFO Has SLSA provenance attestation provenance

Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.

v1.7.24

2 findings
HIGH Provenance attestation missing — previous versions had it provenance

This version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. The axios attack (March 2026) exhibited exactly this pattern.

INFO Publisher changed: GitHub Actions → steffend (on 2026-07-07, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (steffend) than the most recent previously approved version (GitHub Actions) on 2026-07-07, but steffend is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.7.21

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.7.20

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.7.19

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.7.18

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.7.17

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.7.16

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.7.15

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.7.14

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.7.13

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.6.17

2 findings
HIGH Provenance attestation missing — previous versions had it provenance

This version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. The axios attack (March 2026) exhibited exactly this pattern.

INFO Publisher changed: GitHub Actions → steffend (on 2026-07-07, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (steffend) than the most recent previously approved version (GitHub Actions) on 2026-07-07, but steffend is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.5.15

2 findings
HIGH Provenance attestation missing — previous versions had it provenance

This version was published without provenance, but prior versions were published via CI/CD with attestations. This is a strong signal of a potential account compromise or unauthorized publish. The axios attack (March 2026) exhibited exactly this pattern.

INFO Publisher changed: GitHub Actions → steffend (on 2026-07-07, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (steffend) than the most recent previously approved version (GitHub Actions) on 2026-07-07, but steffend is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.