razorpay
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Publish-env change on official SDK; no code-level risk. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Normal cadence for maintained first-party SDK. | ai |
Versions (showing 4 of 4)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.9.8 | 1 / 11 | |
| 2.9.6 | 1 / 11 | |
| 2.9.5 | 1 / 11 | |
| 2.9.4 | 1 / 11 |
v2.9.8
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: ankit_razorpay.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.9.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.9.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.