All smol-toml versions

smol-toml @1.5.2

rejected
This version was rejected. It did not pass GreenFlagged's security review and is not served by the registry. The findings and risk dispositions below explain why.
40
Risk Score
BSD-3-Clause
License
No
Install Scripts
0
Dependencies
11
Dev Dependencies
19.5 KB
Package Size
Published

A small, fast, and correct TOML parser/serializer

Maintainers

cyyynthia

Keywords

tomlparserserializer

Dev Dependencies (11)

PackageConstraintRegistry Status
vitest ^4.0.8 auto_approved
esbuild ^0.27.0 auto_approved
fast-toml ^0.5.4 Not imported
@vitest/ui ^4.0.8 auto_approved
typescript ^5.9.3 auto_approved
@iarna/toml 3.0.0 auto_approved
@ltd/j-toml ^1.38.0 auto_approved
@types/node ^24.10.1 auto_approved
pin-github-action ^3.4.0 auto_approved
@tsconfig/node-lts ^22.0.3 pending
@tsconfig/strictest ^2.0.8 pending

Risk Dispositions (1 applicable to this version, 0 other)

Accepted rules are downgraded to INFO on future analyses; rejected rules escalate to CRITICAL.

Rule Source Disposition Author Reason
osv:GHSA-v3rj-xjv7-4jmq osv reject AI AI (osv): DoS via recursive comment parsing; fixed in 1.6.1. All versions < 1.6.1 are affected; verdict generalizes across those versions.

SAST Findings (2)

MEDIUM GHSA-v3rj-xjv7-4jmq: smol-toml: Denial of Service via TOML documents containing thousands of consecutive commented lines osv

CVSS 5.3 (MEDIUM) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ### Summary An attacker can send a maliciously crafted TOML to cause the parser to crash, because of a stack overflow caused by thousands of consecutive commented lines. The library uses recursion internally while parsing to skip over commented lines, which can be exploited to crash an application that is processing arbitrary TOML documents. ### Proof of concept ```js require("smol-toml").parse('# comment\n'.repeat(8000) + 'key = "value"') ``` ### Impact Applications which parse arbitrary TOML documents may suffer availability issues if they receive malicious input. If uncaught, the crash may cause the application itself to crash. The impact is deemed minor, as the function is already likely to throw errors on invalid input. Downstream users are supposed to properly handle errors in such situations. Due to the design of most JavaScript runtimes, the uncontrolled recursion does not lead to excessive memory usage and the execution is quickly aborted. As a reminder, it is **strongly** advised when working with untrusted user input to expect errors to occur and to appropriately catch them. ### Patches Version 1.6.1 uses a different approach for parsing comments, which no longer involves recursion. ### Workarounds Wrap all invocations of `parse` and `stringify` in a try/catch block when dealing with untrusted user input.

INFO Has SLSA provenance attestation provenance

Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.

Review Summary

Risk score: 40. Findings: 1 critical (+40), 1 info (+0).

Published to npm: