troika-three-utils
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:protectwise.com | AI (email-domain): Legacy corporate email on a well-established package; not a per-version malicious signal. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance is common; benign for this long-established package. | ai |
Versions (showing 49 of 49)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.53.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.52.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.52.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.52.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.51.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.50.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.50.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.49.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.48.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.47.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.47.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.46.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.45.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.44.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.43.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.42.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.41.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.40.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.39.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.38.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.38.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.37.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.36.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.35.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.34.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.33.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.32.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.31.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.30.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.29.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.28.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.28.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.27.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.26.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.25.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.24.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.23.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.22.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.21.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.20.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.19.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.18.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.17.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.17.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.16.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.15.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.15.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.15.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.15.0 | 0 / 0 |
v0.53.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.52.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.52.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.51.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.50.3
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.50.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.49.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.48.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.47.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.47.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.46.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.45.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.44.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.43.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.42.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.41.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.40.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.39.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.38.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.38.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.37.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.36.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.35.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.34.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.33.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.32.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.31.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.30.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.29.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.28.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.28.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.27.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.26.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.25.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.24.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.23.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.22.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.21.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.20.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.19.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.18.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.17.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.17.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.16.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.15.7
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.15.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.15.3
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.15.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.