troika-worker-utils
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:protectwise.com | AI (email-domain): Long-standing maintainer domain for a stable, high-download package; not evidence of takeover. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Mature, stable package with infrequent releases; matches normal maintenance cadence. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:new-function-constructor | AI (semgrep): Occurs only in __tests__/_jsdom-worker.js, a test helper that polyfills Web Worker behavior in jsdom. Intentional and not part of the published runtime code. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:eval-usage | AI (semgrep): Occurs only in __tests__/_jsdom-worker.js for simulating Worker execution context in jsdom tests. Not reachable by package consumers. | ai |
Versions (showing 49 of 49)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.53.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.52.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.51.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.51.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.50.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.49.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.48.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.47.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.47.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.46.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.45.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.44.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.43.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.42.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.41.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.40.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.39.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.38.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.38.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.37.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.36.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.35.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.34.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.34.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.33.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.32.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.31.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.30.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.29.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.28.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.27.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.26.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.26.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.25.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.24.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.23.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.22.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.21.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.20.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.19.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.18.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.17.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.17.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.16.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.15.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.15.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.14.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.13.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.13.0 | 0 / 0 |
v0.53.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.51.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.51.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.50.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.49.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.48.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.47.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.47.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.46.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.45.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.44.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.43.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.42.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.41.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.40.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.39.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.38.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.38.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.37.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.36.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.35.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.34.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.34.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.33.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.32.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.31.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.30.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.29.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.28.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.27.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.26.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.26.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.25.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.24.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.23.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.22.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.21.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.20.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.19.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.18.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.17.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.17.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.16.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.15.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.15.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.14.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.13.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.13.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'protectwise.com' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.