tsover-runtime
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition from iwoplaza to GitHub Actions CI/CD with SLSA attestation under software-mansion org; legitimate automation migration. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Package is a minimal runtime lib; sparse README is expected for a niche TypeScript operator-overloading utility. | ai |
Versions (showing 7 of 7)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.7 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.0.6 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.0.5 | 2 / 5 | |
| 0.0.4 | 2 / 5 | |
| 0.0.3 | 2 / 5 | |
| 0.0.2 | 2 / 5 | |
| 0.0.1 | 2 / 5 |
v0.0.7
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-11. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.