← Home

vscode-languageserver-textdocument

A simple text document implementation for Node LSP servers

14
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

microsoft1esmicrosoft-oss-releasesalexandrudimadbaeumerjoaomoreno.mskaimaetzelsbattenlszomoruvscode-bot

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed-stale AI (provenance): dbaeumer→vscode-bot org handoff, stable 1318d; legitimate Microsoft pipeline. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): Microsoft org bot/team accounts; expected for official package. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-removed AI (maintainer-change): Individual devs replaced by org accounts; benign transfer. ai
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): Secure-pipeline publish drops gitHead; no malicious signal. ai

Versions (showing 14 of 14)

Version Deps Published
1.0.13 0 / 0
1.0.12 0 / 0
1.0.11 0 / 0
1.0.10 0 / 0
1.0.9 0 / 0
1.0.8 0 / 0
1.0.7 0 / 0
1.0.6 0 / 0
1.0.5 0 / 0
1.0.4 0 / 0
1.0.3 0 / 0
1.0.2 0 / 0
1.0.1 0 / 0
1.0.0 0 / 0

v1.0.10

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: vscode-bot.

MEDIUM Publisher changed: dbaeumer → vscode-bot (on 2023-04-19, unremoved on npm for 1187d) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (vscode-bot) than the most recent previously approved version (dbaeumer) on 2023-04-19. It has since remained available on npm for 1187 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.9

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: vscode-bot.

MEDIUM Publisher changed: dbaeumer → vscode-bot (on 2023-01-16, unremoved on npm for 1280d) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (vscode-bot) than the most recent previously approved version (dbaeumer) on 2023-01-16. It has since remained available on npm for 1280 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.8

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: vscode-bot.

MEDIUM Publisher changed: dbaeumer → vscode-bot (on 2022-12-09, unremoved on npm for 1318d) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (vscode-bot) than the most recent previously approved version (dbaeumer) on 2022-12-09. It has since remained available on npm for 1318 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.7

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.6

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.5

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.4

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.3

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.2

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: aeschli → dbaeumer (on 2021-10-08, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (dbaeumer) than the most recent previously approved version (aeschli) on 2021-10-08, but dbaeumer is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.0.1

2 findings
MEDIUM Publisher changed: dbaeumer → aeschli (on 2020-02-21, unremoved on npm for 2340d) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (aeschli) than the most recent previously approved version (dbaeumer) on 2020-02-21. It has since remained available on npm for 2340 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.